Tag Archives: advice

RPG Stack Exchange – A Year Later

If you are familiar with Stack Overflow or the other technical Q&A sites powered by the no-nonsense engine Joel Spolsky came up with, you may want to know that they’re spreading the idea to many other subjects.  RPG Stack Exchange has been in beta for a year and has garnered more than 2000 questions.  Here’s a sampling of the top ten!

  1. Who created the idea of Experience Points?
  2. What tools are useful to organize a GM’s campaign notes?
  3. How many people does it take to steal a Star Destroyer?
  4. What approaches are there to lessen or eliminate reliance upon dice in an RPG?
  5. How do I get my PCs to not be a bunch of murderous cretins?
  6. As a man, how can I roleplay a woman better?
  7. 3d6 vs a d20: What is the effect of a different probability curve?
  8. How do you help players not focus on the rules?
  9. What alternative monsters are there to replace orcs, kobolds, and hobgoblins in low-level encounters?
  10. Playing 4th Ed D&D for the first time, what should I read to avoid holding everyone back?

Go check ’em out – lots of good collected wisdom here. 90% less crap than forum threads!

A RPG Stack Exchange?

There’s a proposal up to start a RPG site using Stack Exchange.  Stack Exchange powers the excellent technical advice sites Stack Overflow and Server Fault.

I think this will be a great format.  Frankly I’m sick of all the forums – rpg.net, enworld – with their ubiquitous moderators with an axe to grind and demented clique politics, and full of nimrods making self-congratulatory off topic posts.  With Stack Exchange, everyone gets to vote on questions and answers so the good discussions and ideas float to the top.  And it’s focused on the question/answer format, which is very useful for, you know, questions and answers – in forums those often get mixed in with other stuff.

So go vote for it!

What’s Good For The Goose

I wanted to talk a little about in-game GM rulings, and making sure you are not unfairly disadvantaging players in the name of realism.

This was inspired by a thread on the Paizo boards about “My GM doesn’t let me move with a loaded crossbow, he says the bolt will fall out.”  But it led me to think about a lot of related rulings and general tendencies I’ve seen among GMs over time.  A desire for “realism” is admirable, but it shouldn’t be restricted to just PCs and thus discriminate against them.

Think about it from your player’s point of view.  If you:

  • make them track encumbrance minutely
  • require them to make a lot of rolls to “wake up” in a campsite combat
  • make them not carry loaded crossbows
  • make them draw their swords in the first round of every combat
  • require lots of skill checks to distinguish their ass from a hole in the ground
  • and other stuff like that

You really need to think about whether you are requiring the same of NPCs and opponents.  Because most of the time, when I as a player wander into the bad guys’ barracks, they are all up and attacking on the first round.  None are ever dozing, busy taking a dump, out of their armor, thirty feet away from their weapon, slowed by their gear, et cetera.   They are all watching the door and immediately recognize that the PCs are no one they know from their whole fortress.  (Unless it’s one of those scripted “they’re all asleep if you make Stealth checks” rooms.)  No humanoid is ever encumbered (nor, seemingly, do they carry about the food and water and supplies that they likely would need to survive if they were a PC).

Which is fine, you can decide if you want a very simulationist detail-heavy kind of game or not.  But what’s not appropriate is to make the PCs deal with the minutiae and not inflict it on the enemy.  If your PCs are having to worry about their potions breaking when they fall ten feet, or about all the arrows falling out of their quiver when they get tripped, you need to be as anal on the bad guys.

You think you don’t do that?  Well, let’s see.  Do you require a Stealth check from everyone in the party (and when rolling 6 d20s, someone’s going to roll low)  whenever they are trying to sneak up on some enemy emplacement, and if so, do you make monsters do the same thing?   There’s a very common fallacy I see all the time here – PCs are sensed, and don’t sense anything, unless they take positive action to make a skill check.  On the other hand, bad guys are never sensed, and sense everything, unless a PC specifically is actively using Spot or Stealth to thwart them.

Do your PCs always have wounds, long term ability damage, and hangovers from drinking or fatigue from not sleeping the previous night?  Well, if the bad guys are a gang of berserkers in a war zone, why are they always totally fresh and unimpaired?

I’m definitely not anti-realism.  I like a gritty “everyman” campaign from time to time.  If you want to go that route, you *can* inflict similar hindrances on your NPCs. Remember that from their point of view, it’s the PCs who are the wandering monsters.

Give your players breaks!  If the alarm hasn’t been raised and they’re sneaking around a castle, why would the off duty guardsman intent on his whittling even bother looking up when someone in armor walks into the barracks?  He has a pretty good chance of just continuing and only realizing something’s wrong when someone runs at him with a sword.  Flat-footed should be a common ailment among bad guys in a location that’s not on alert.  Some percentage of people should be asleep, depending on their sleep cycle… Even if they run watches 24×7, at least a fourth of the people/creatures in the dungeon/castle/ruin are asleep at any given time.

Do quick ad hoc rolls for “combat readiness.”  Roll one bandit as a random encounter?  Roll d20, and “1” means he left his weapon and armor back in his tent and is sprinting to the latrine because he’s vomiting (“sickened”) from too much rum.   Not only is it “cutting PCs a break” (though not really, because you probably inflict all this on them), but it makes your world seem a lot more realistic.